nerozdělitelné mezery

Hezký den,
coby původem sazeče mě irituje problém... Nenašel jsem způsob jak nějak automaticky vyřešit pevné mezery za neslabičnými předložkami a jednoznakovými spojkami. Jednak je to neestetické a jednak je to pravopisně blbě. Neexistuje nějaké řešení pro jakýkoliv editor? JCE, JCK, TinyMCE? Psát je ručně ja fekt dost šílený...
Díky, Radim

Jo, jo... to tlačítko znám. Spíš jsem myslel, jestli neexistuje něco podobného tomuto (tohle je pro zlomovou aplikaci):

//WiszaceSpojniki.js by Henryk Jursz, HenJ, www.jursz.com , may - june 2007, september 2007
//InDesign&InCopy CS/CS2/CS3 script

WS_Script = "WiszaceSpojniki 1.1, \u00a92007 Henryk Jursz";

if (((app.name == "Adobe InDesign") || (app.name == "Adobe InCopy")) && (app.documents.length != 0))
{
(app.version[0] < "4") ? (app.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevels.interactWithAll) : (app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevels.interactWithAll);
var WS_Select = new Array;
for (x = app.selection.length-1; x > -1 ; x --)
{
if ((app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Cell") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Character")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Column") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Line")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Paragraph") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Row")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Story") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Table")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Text") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "TextColumn")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "TextFrame") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "TextStyleRange")
|| (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "TextPath") || (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Word"))
{
(app.selection[x].contents.length > 1) ? (WS_Select.push(app.selection[x])) : {};
}
if (app.selection[x].constructor.name == "Group")
{
for (y = app.selection[x].textFrames.length-1; y > -1; y --)
{
(app.selection[x].textFrames[y].contents.length > 1) ? (WS_Select.push(app.selection[x].textFrames[y])) : {};
}
for (y = app.selection[x].groups.length-1; y > -1; y --)
{
for (z = app.selection[x].textFrames.length-1; z > -1; z --)
{
(app.selection[x].groups[y].textFrames[z].contents.length > 1) ? (WS_Select.push(app.selection[x].groups[y].textFrames[z])) : {};
}
}
}
}
myScriptFRClear();
if (app.version[0] < "5")
{
if ((WS_Select.length == 1) && (WS_Select[0].constructor.name == "Text"))
{
function myScriptFR(WS_What, WS_ForWhat, WS_Styles)
{
var myWS_check = new Array;
app.changePreferences.noBreak = WS_Styles;
myWS_check = app.selection[0].search(WS_What, false, true, WS_ForWhat)
}
}
else
{
function myScriptFR(WS_What, WS_ForWhat, WS_Styles)
{
var myWS_check = new Array;
app.changePreferences.noBreak = WS_Styles;
for (WS_loop = WS_Select.length-1; WS_loop > -1; WS_loop --)
{
myWS_check = WS_Select[WS_loop].search(WS_What, false, true, WS_ForWhat);
}
}
}
var myWS_TmpArr = [",", ".", ":", ";", "!", "?", "(", "{", "[", " ", "^n", "^t", "^p", "^s"];
var myWS_FindArray = ["a", "A", "i", "I", "k", "K", "o", "O", "s", "S", "u", "U", "v", "V", "z", "Z"];
for (x = 0; x < myWS_FindArray.length; x ++)
{
for (y = 0; y < myWS_TmpArr.length; y ++)
{
try
{
myScriptFR(myWS_TmpArr[y] + myWS_FindArray[x] + " ", myWS_TmpArr[y] + myWS_FindArray[x] + "^s", false);
}
catch (e) {}
}
}
}
else myScriptFRCS3("((?<\<[a|i|k|o|s|u|v|z|A|I|K|O|S|U|V|Z]) )", "~S", false);
(app.version[0] < "5") ? (myScriptFR("^s", " ", true)) : {};
myScriptFRClear();
}//end char - don't touch!!

function myScriptFRClear()
{
if (app.version[0] < "5")
{
app.findPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;
app.changePreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;
}
else
{
app.findGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;
app.changeGrepPreferences = NothingEnum.nothing;
app.findChangeGrepOptions.includeFootnotes = true;
app.findChangeGrepOptions.includeHiddenLayers = false;
app.findChangeGrepOptions.includeLockedLayersForFind = false;
app.findChangeGrepOptions.includeLockedStoriesForFind = false;
app.findChangeGrepOptions.includeMasterPages = false;
}
}

function myScriptFRCS3(WS_What, WS_ForWhat, WS_Styles)
{
var myWS_check = new Array;
app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = WS_What;
app.changeGrepPreferences.changeTo = WS_ForWhat;
app.changeGrepPreferences.noBreak = WS_Styles;
if ((WS_Select.length == 1) && (WS_Select[0].constructor.name == "Text"))
{
myWS_check = app.selection[0].changeGrep();
}
else for (WS_loop = WS_Select.length-1; WS_loop > -1; WS_loop --)
{
myWS_check = WS_Select[WS_loop].changeGrep();
}
}
//end of HardBreaker script (by Henryk Jursz, HenJ 2007)

tak pokud vim, nic takoveho neni
ono je totiz i rozdil mezi typografii tistenou a typografii webovou
bezne se na webu neresi:
pomlcka vs. spojovnik vs. minus vs. dlouha pomlcka (historicka)
radkovy zlom
tri tecky vs. vypustka
eng uvozovky vs. cz uvozovky
nasobeni - tecka, hvezdicka, krat
...
naslo by se toho vice a resit to na webu mi v komplexnim pohledu prijde jako kontraproduktivni

Jo, jasněže jsou tyto dva přístupy k typografii odlišné. To jen, že rozjíždím stránky, kde se cituje m. j. i z klasické literatury a tak... Zjevně nezbývá než holt klofat na tlačítko v editoru. I tak díky... Radim